Browse Talent
    • Why Terminal
    • Hire Developers in Canada
    • Hire Developers in LatAm
    • Hire Developers in Europe
    • Success Stories
  • Hiring Plans
Engineers Browse Talent
Go back to Resources

Hiring + recruiting | Blog Post

Top Triplebyte Alternatives for Hiring Software Engineers Remotely in 2024

Adesuwa Ebuehi

Share this post

Triplebyte is one of the most recent contenders in the remote hiring world. It launched in 2015 and since became a favored talent-sourcing solution for many companies and startups. However, it no longer operates for reasons that we’ll explore. Given that, what are top Triplebyte alternatives you can consider to help find top software developers for your growing development team?

What Were Triplebyte’s Features?

Triplebyte was popular with many companies, including a few in Silicon Valley. It offered:

  • Triplebyte’s technical assessment product and team are well-known for their rigor in screening candidates. 
  • Triplebyte’s sizable talent pool contains developers with different experience levels, from entry-level to elite. 
  • The platform’s business model accommodated both job postings and talent hiring services. 
  • Due to its focus on hiring software developers, the platform did not suffer the distraction of having to split attention and resources between unrelated remote job sectors. 
  • If you requested a software developer on Triplebyte, the hiring process takes an average of 10 days, making it a very fast hiring platform. 
  • Depending on the arrangement you choose, Triplebyte could be pretty affordable to work with. Pay rates are hourly and range from as low as $8 to $61.
  • Triplebyte did court the ire of the developers through some of their choices, namely making developer profiles public without consent.

Reasons to Consider Triplebyte Alternatives for Hiring Software Engineers

Namely, Triplebyte no longer exists. Karat, a Seattle-based global interviewing company, acquired Triplebyte in 2023. It assumed control of the platform’s technical assessment product and team and subsequently announced that it would downsize the talent-sourcing network Magnet. The core Triplebyte service has since been wound down.

This has created a gap in the marketplace, as many hiring companies appreciated their approach to managing pre-vetted talent and screening them.  There are several alternatives that go above and beyond what Triplebyte was able to offer.

Remote Developer Hiring Alternatives to Triplebyte

Triplebyte may not be the best platform for your hiring needs, but there are countless other competitors worth looking at. So, let’s examine Triplebyte vs. its alternatives. 


For a while now, Latin America’s growing pool of highly skilled software developers has seen the region poised to play a pivotal role in the global tech industry. is the most popular remote hiring platform that has seen the direction of those clouds and moved with them. If you’re looking to hire some of the best developers in the world, Latin America is the source, and is the pipeline. is a smart technology-powered talent-sourcing company offering full remote hiring services globally. In addition to Latin America, the platform sources developers of various skill levels from Canada, Spain, and Eastern Europe, the latter being another fast-emerging developer talent hot region. Terminal is a favorite among tech talent-reliant companies, from major tech companies like Google to startups like Nextdoor, Him & Hers, and Transfix. 

Triplebyte vs

When you compare Triplebyte and, it immediately becomes evident that the latter outclasses the former on so many levels. 

  • Terminal’s merging of machine learning with human expertise achieves the best recruiting and talent-matching results in the industry. Its vetting process is also much more rigorous and reliable. While Triplebyte has its own machine learning-based product, it does not perform as well as Terminal’s. 
  • has very flexible hiring options. You can hire freelancers on its platform on a short-term basis. You can also employ full-time developers, upgrade part-time developer contracts to full-time through their contract-to-hire option, or take advantage of its remote team augmentation service. By comparison, Triplebyte only allows one-off and full-time job engagements. 
  • While the talent-sourcing platform mainly recruits and hires mid- to elite-level tech talent, it is still an excellent service for hiring entry-level talent.
  • Unlike Triplebyte, Terminal is upfront about its pricing, which is very affordable, mainly thanks to time-zone alignment benefits to those hiring domestically in the US. Terminal offers up to 60% cost savings; Triplebyte provides nothing of the sort. 
  • You can enjoy peace of mind for hiring through Terminal, including up to 14 days of risk-free trial and a three-month free replacement offer. 
  • Hiring on Terminal is up to 40% faster than traditional hiring and, depending on your selected arrangement, twice as fast as Triplebyte. For part-time and short-term contracts, you can get assigned a new developer within 7 to 14 days. Full-time hires and custom sourcing arrangements may take longer. 
  • Terminal offers a full-process service, covering everything from talent sourcing and vetting to matching, interviewing, and onboarding, thereby taking all the stress involved in hiring onto itself and off your hands.

Want to see Terminal’s developer talent instantly? View vetted engineers for free now

2. is a 300,000-strong global pool of software developers and designers catering to over 800 companies. It is best known for HireAI recruiter, an artificial intelligence that interacts with and helps talent seekers assess matches from the global talent pool. With its focus on tech talent, the platform is quite niche, offering many developers skilled in common technologies like Ruby on Rails, Javascript, etc.

Triplebyte vs.

Many companies relying on developer talent prefer to Triplebyte because of the following main selling points. 

  • Arc’s AI, though less reliable than Terminal’s, is more reliable than Triplebyte’s. 
  • is in the cost savings club; it can save you up to 58% on hiring costs. It’s also in the free trial club, with its three-week offer, allowing you to test up to three developers simultaneously. Triplebyte belongs in neither of these clubs. 
  • While Triplebyte has recently undergone a significant downsizing, Arc has not been undermined in that way. 
  • Arc is much faster than Triplebyte in hiring and can get you a developer in under 72 hours. 
  • Compared to Triplebyte, Arc offers much more flexible hiring arrangements. It offers part-time, full-time, and permanent hiring. Downsides

If you hire your developers on, you will have to deal with two significant drawbacks. First, Arc is almost as opaque about its pricing as Triplebyte. While it is still better than Triplebyte in this regard, it is worse than

There is also Arc’s lack of a developer onboarding service, which means you are entirely responsible for onboarding any developers you hire, as stressful as that may be. Alternatives like Terminal will serve you better in this regard. 

3. is a tech-focused job search marketplace and hiring platform that claims to have met the talent sourcing needs of over 10,000 companies. The platform was founded in 2002, making it among the oldest of the Triplebyte competitors in the remote hiring market. is not fully remote, as it has physical headquarters in New York, US.

Triplebyte vs. Hired

When comparing Triplebyte and, a few selling points for the latter come to the fore. 

  • With an average hiring time of 10 days after the initial interview, is as fast as Triplebyte. 
  • leverages AI technology to provide a reliable matching and hiring service. 
  • The platform caters quite well to custom sourcing requests and can provide developers for a few niche developer roles. Drawbacks

To begin with, offers a different variety of hiring options than Triplebyte but is still just as limited because there are only two: full-time and contract. For other arrangements, you’d have to try a different alternative. Then, there is the platform’s failure to disclose its prices and its lack of trial periods or cost-saving benefits. There is also the fact that you have to onboard your new hires yourself. Finally, many companies that hire from the platform complain about its faulty notification system that tends to flood you with irrelevant alerts.

4. Adecco

Located in Zurich, Switzerland, Adecco is one of the world’s biggest staffing agencies. Given that it was founded all the way back in 1997, this may not be surprising. The company specializes in temporary and permanent staffing as well as talent development, business consulting, and career transition, and it claims to have successfully placed over 3.5 million people in permanent job roles. A little fun fact about Adecco: the company is more correctly known as Adecco Group — this group happens to have acquired in 2020, adding it to their collection of several other sites like Triplebyte.

Triplebyte vs. Adecco

Adecco’s talent-sourcing service leverages a ton of industry experience, which already sets it above Triplebyte in at least one regard. But that’s not the only reason to consider it when hiring developers.  

  • Adecco wins over Triplebyte regarding the variety of hiring terms; available types include short-term, short-term-to-hire, and direct hire. 
  • Adecco’s talent pool includes developers from entry-level through elite level, all specializing in various fields. 
  • Despite the far more expansive geographical scope of its services, Adecco’s hiring speed is 48 hours (or two days) compared to Triplebyte’s 10. You can access the former’s talent-hiring services from over 60 countries in the Americas, Europe, Africa, Asia Pacific, and the Middle East. In contrast, Triplebyte’s “global” service only covers the US, Canada, and some European and Asian countries. 

Adecco Shortfalls

If you have a problem with monopolistic or overly large companies, you might not like Adecco and its ungainly library of several other brands, including But even less desirable is the generality of its careers; the platform caters to other industries like finance, business, healthcare, transportation, public services, and law. It’s hard to be a great developer hiring platform with one foot in tech and the other in a host of other industries.

Adecco also doesn’t disclose its pricing information to the general public. What is more, it doesn’t take care of onboarding or offer any trial periods or cost savings.

5. Toptal

When it comes to freelancing, Toptal is among best-known sites like Triplebyte on the planet. With about 4,000 freelancers in its ecosystem, it’s not as big as Adecco or It’s also not as robust in tech talent sourcing as Terminal. However, it’s a great alternative to Triplebyte for hiring tech talent, albeit underperforming compared to platforms that focus on that industry. 

Triplebyte vs. Toptal

Toptal already has the advantage of being a far more active and non-downsized company over Toptal. In addition to that, consider the following other ways in which Toptal proves to be a better option than Triplebyte.

  • Toptal’s pricing is out there for all to see, which can’t be said for Triplebyte. Even some of the alternatives we have discussed so far, except Terminal, are not as open with their costs. 
  • Toptal’s hourly rates for software engineers are between $60 and $200. Depending on your requested hire’s skill and experience level, it can be as affordable as Triplebyte. 
  • Suppose your project or role requires full-time engagement from a skilled professional, or you just need a quick infusion of developer power to complete a short task. Toptal perfectly suits these needs. The platform can hire full-time and short-term developers and upgrade a short-term contract to full-time. 
  • As a freelancing platform, Toptal can ready your requested hire in less than two days. This contrasts Triplebyte, which will have you waiting for at least 10 days, regardless of the sourcing requirement. 
  • Like (and unlike Triplebyte), Toptal has a two-week free trial period. 

Toptal Drawbacks

Toptal’s non-specialization in tech and its focus on established companies are its main downsides. It is also not very well suited for satisfying tailored hiring requirements — an unsurprising consequence of its non-specialization. Add that to the absence of any cost-cutting benefits and its non-involvement in integrating developers into their new working environment, and you may find that you need a different Triplebyte competitor — such as Terminal. 

6. X-Team

X-team is a fully remote, tech-oriented community of elite developers from over 75 countries worldwide. These include countries in Africa, Latin America, Europe, and Asia that have quite recently begun to boom as sources of in-demand developer talent. The platform prides itself on inclusion, diversity, human capital development, and a team-oriented work ethic.

Triplebyte vs X-Team

In addition to drawing developer talent from a more diverse, global pool and operating at an undiminished capacity, X-Team has the following advantages over Triplebyte.

  • Its team-oriented internal culture makes it far more suited than Triplebyte to hiring developers into roles requiring team cooperation. 
  • X-team hirings can take less time than Triplebyte. You can request a developer and expect to have them ready for their new job in a few days, although some roles may take weeks to fill. 
  • When it comes to onboarding your new hire, X-team has your back. This is primarily because of the platform’s team-oriented culture, which breeds an interest in ensuring that your developer integrates perfectly into their new team. 

X-Team Shortfalls

X-team’s website does not share its developer rates or pricing fees, so you have to get on the site and initiate hiring negotiations before you find out more about this Triplebyte alternative. Additionally, X-team professionals are all of the elite caliber, so getting an entry-level software engineer on the platform is impractical. To add to this lack of variety in available expertise levels, the platform only sources and hires full-time developers, so if you need part-time, short-term, or single-task contract staff, you won’t find them there.

What’s the Best of the Triplebyte Alternatives?

There are so many contending remote developer platforms, and the array of choices can be hard to navigate. However, this in-depth article contains the best Triplebyte alternatives available. While nearly all of them have shortcomings relative to Triplebyte, they are all superior in many important ways. 

However, one of these offers a well-rounded and truly balanced talent-sourcing solution with no notable weak angles: It affords you everything you need in a hiring platform — speed, reliability, global credibility, affordability, incentives, flexibility, transparency, variety regarding available developer talent, tech specialization, masterful AI utilization, you name it. And so, forget Triplebyte or any of these other platforms, gallantly as they may contend. Enter the Terminal and explore a world of top-notch, unrivaled remote talent hiring service.

Recommended reading

Hiring + recruiting | Blog Post

15 Machine Learning Interview Questions for Hiring Machine Learning Engineers