Top Triplebyte Alternatives for Hiring Software Engineers Remotely in 2026

One of the more recent contenders in the remote hiring world, Triplebyte launched in 2015 and has since become a favored talent-sourcing solution for many established companies and startups. As of 2026, the talent marketplace/hiring platform is no longer in operation.

Since Triplebyte is no longer an option, where do you look if you want to hire remote software engineers? The good news is that there are many Triplebyte alternatives to consider. Keep reading to learn about the top contenders. 

What Were Triplebyte’s Features?

Triplebyte was popular with many companies, including several in Silicon Valley. What, exactly, did the platform offer? 

• Triplebyte’s technical assessment product and team were well-known for their rigor in screening candidates. 
• Triplebyte’s sizable talent pool included developers with different experience levels, from entry-level to senior.
• The platform’s business model accommodated both job postings and talent hiring services. 
• Due to its complete focus on hiring software developers, the platform did not suffer the distraction of having to split attention and resources between unrelated remote job sectors. 
• If you requested a software developer on Triplebyte, the hiring process took an average of 10 days, making it a very fast hiring process. 
• Depending on the arrangement you chose, Triplebyte could be affordable to work with. Pay rates were hourly and ranged from as low as $8 to $61.
• There were some drawbacks to Triplebyte. For example, developers complained that the platform was making developer profiles public without their consent.

Reasons to Consider Triplebyte Alternatives for Hiring Software Engineers

Namely, you should consider alternatives because Triplebyte no longer exists. Karat, a Seattle-based global interviewing company, acquired Triplebyte in 2023. It assumed control of the platform’s technical assessment product and team and subsequently announced that it would downsize the talent-sourcing network Magnet. The core Triplebyte service has since been discontinued.

This has created a gap in the marketplace because many hiring companies appreciated the platform’s approach to managing and screening pre-vetted talent. But the good news is that there are several alternatives that go above and beyond what Triplebyte was able to offer.

Remote Developer Hiring Alternatives to Triplebyte

Triplebyte may not be the best platform for your hiring needs, but there are countless other competitors worth looking at. So, let’s look at Triplebyte vs. its alternatives. 

1. Terminal.io 

For years, Latin America’s growing pool of highly skilled software developers has become pivotal to the global tech industry. A popular remote hiring platform, Terminal has taken note of the premier talent in this and other regions, including Europe and Canada. If you’re looking to hire some of the best developers in the world, Terminal.io is the pipeline. 

Terminal.io uses a combination of smart technology and experts on local hiring to offer fully remote hiring services globally. The platform sources developers of various skill levels with diverse specializations from fast-emerging developer talent hot regions. Terminal is a favorite among tech talent-reliant companies, ranging from major tech companies like Google to growing startups like Nextdoor, Him & Hers, and Transfix. 

Triplebyte vs Terminal.io

When you compare Triplebyte and Terminal.io, Terminal wins on many levels:

• Unlike Triplebyte, Terminal has not been undermined by any strategic acquisitions. It has also not downsized one bit since its inception; instead, Terminal is an ever-growing platform. In fact, while Terminal.io operates globally, Triplebyte is a global service only in name.
• Terminal’s merging of machine learning with human expertise achieves the best recruiting and talent-matching results in the industry—a 99.9% matching success rate, to be exact. Its vetting process is also much more rigorous and reliable. While Triplebyte has its own machine learning-based product, it does not perform as well as Terminal’s. 
• Terminal.io has very flexible hiring options. You can hire freelancers on its platform on a part-time or short-term basis. You can also employ full-time developers, upgrade part-time developer contracts to full-time, or take advantage of its remote team augmentation service. By comparison, Triplebyte only allowed one-off and full-time job engagements. 
• While the talent-sourcing platform mainly recruits and hires mid- to elite-level tech talent, it is still an excellent service for hiring entry-level talent.
• Unlike Triplebyte, Terminal is upfront about its pricing, which is very affordable, mainly thanks to time-zone alignment with those hiring domestically in the US. Terminal offers up to 40% cost savings; Triplebyte provides nothing of the sort. 
• You can enjoy juicy promotions for hiring on Terminal, including up to 14 days of risk-free trial and a three-month free replacement offer. 
• Hiring on Terminal is up to 35% faster than traditional hiring and, depending on your selected arrangement, twice as fast as Triplebyte. For part-time and short-term contracts, you can get assigned a new developer within seven to 14 days. Full-time hires and custom sourcing arrangements may take longer. 
• Terminal offers a full-process service, covering everything from talent sourcing and vetting to matching, interviewing, and onboarding, taking all the stress involved in hiring off your hands.

2. Arc.dev

Arc.dev is a 300,000-strong global pool of software developers and designers catering to over 800 companies. It is best known for HireAI recruiter, an artificial intelligence solution that interacts with and helps talent seekers assess matches from the global talent pool. With its focus on tech talent, the platform is quite niche, offering many developers skilled in relatively obscure technologies.

Triplebyte vs. Arc.dev

Many companies relying on developer talent prefer Arc.dev to Triplebyte because of the following selling points. 

• Arc’s AI system, though less reliable than Terminal’s, is more reliable than Triplebyte’s. 
• Arc.dev is in the cost savings club; it can save you up to 58% on hiring costs. It’s also in the free trial club, with its three-week offer, allowing you to test up to three developers simultaneously. Triplebyte belongs in neither of these clubs. 
• While Triplebyte has recently undergone significant downsizing, Arc has not been undermined in that way. 
• Arc is much faster than Triplebyte in hiring and can get you a developer in under 72 hours. 
• Compared to Triplebyte, Arc offers much more flexible hiring arrangements. It offers part-time, full-time, and permanent hiring. 

Arc.dev Downsides

If you hire your developers through Arc.dev, you will have to deal with two significant drawbacks. First, Arc is almost as opaque about its pricing as Triplebyte. While it is still better than Triplebyte in this regard, it falls short compared with alternatives like Terminal.

There is also Arc’s lack of a developer onboarding service, which means you are entirely responsible for onboarding any developers you hire, as stressful as that may be. Alternatives like Terminal will serve you better in this regard. 

3. Hired.com

Hired.com is a tech-focused job search marketplace and hiring platform that claims to have met the talent sourcing needs of over 10,000 companies. The platform was founded in 2002, making it among the oldest contenders in the remote hiring market. Hired.com is not fully remote; it has physical headquarters in New York.

Triplebyte vs. Hired

When comparing Triplebyte and Hired.com, consider these factors:

• With an average hiring time of 10 days after the initial interview, Hired.com is as fast as Triplebyte. 
• Hired.com leverages AI technology to provide a reliable matching and hiring service. 
• The platform caters quite well to custom sourcing requests and can provide developers for a few niche developer roles. 

Hired.com Drawbacks

To begin with, Hired.com offers only two hiring models: full-time and contract. For other arrangements, you’d have to try a different alternative. Then, there is the platform’s failure to disclose its prices and its lack of trial periods or cost-saving benefits. There’s also the fact that you have to onboard your new hires yourself. Finally, many companies that hire from the platform complain about its faulty notification system that tends to flood you with irrelevant alerts.

4. Adecco

Located in Zurich, Switzerland, Adecco is one of the world’s biggest staffing agencies. Given that it was founded all the way back in 1997, this probably isn’t too surprising. The company specializes in temporary and permanent staffing, as well as talent development, business consulting, and career transition, and it claims to have successfully placed over 3.5 million people in permanent job roles. A little fun fact about Adecco: The company is more correctly known as Adecco Group, the group that happens to have acquired Hired.com in 2020, adding it to its portfolio of several other brands. 

Triplebyte vs. Adecco

Adecco’s talent-sourcing service leverages significant industry experience, which already sets it above Triplebyte in at least one regard. But that’s not the only reason to consider it when hiring developers.  

• Adecco wins over Triplebyte regarding the variety of hiring terms; available types include short-term, short-term-to-hire, and direct hire. 
• Adecco’s talent pool includes developers from entry-level through elite level, all specializing in various fields. 
• Despite the far more expansive geographical scope of its services, Adecco’s hiring speed is 48 hours (or two days) compared to Triplebyte’s 10. You can access Adecco’s talent-hiring services from over 60 countries in the Americas, Europe, Africa, Asia Pacific, and the Middle East. In contrast, Triplebyte’s “global” service only covers the US, Canada, and some European and Asian countries. 

Adecco’s Drawbacks

If you have a problem with monopolistic or overly large companies, you might not like Adecco and its ungainly library of several other brands, including Hired.com. But even less desirable is its failure to specialize; the platform caters to other industries like finance, business, healthcare, transportation, public services, and law. It’s hard to be a great developer hiring platform with one foot in tech and the other in a host of other industries.

Adecco also doesn’t disclose its pricing information to the general public. It also doesn’t handle onboarding or offer any trial periods or cost savings. 

5. Toptal

When it comes to freelancing, Toptal is among the best-known platforms on the planet. With about 4,000 freelancers in its ecosystem, it’s not as big as Adecco or Arc.dev. It’s also not as robust in tech talent sourcing as Terminal. However, it’s a great alternative to Triplebyte for hiring tech talent, albeit underperforming compared to platforms that focus on the tech industry. 

Triplebyte vs. Toptal

Toptal already has the advantage of being a far more active and non-downsized company than Triplebyte. Consider the following other ways in which Toptal is a better option than Triplebyte:

• Toptal’s pricing is transparent and readily available, which can’t be said for Triplebyte. Even some of the alternatives we have discussed so far, except Terminal, are not as open with their costs. 
• Toptal’s hourly rates for software engineers are between $60 and $200. Depending on your requested hire’s skill and experience level, it can be as affordable as Triplebyte. 
• Suppose your project or role requires full-time engagement from a skilled professional, or you just need a quick infusion of developer power to complete a short task. Toptal perfectly suits these needs. The platform can hire full-time and short-term developers and upgrade a short-term contract to full-time. 
• As a freelancing platform, Toptal can prepare your requested hire in less than two days. This contrasts with Triplebyte, which will have you waiting for at least 10 days, regardless of the sourcing requirement. 
• Like Terminal.io (and unlike Triplebyte), Toptal has a two-week free trial period. 

Toptal Drawbacks

Toptal’s non-specialization in tech and its focus on established companies are its main downsides. It is also not very well suited for satisfying tailored hiring requirements, an unsurprising consequence of its non-specialization. Add that to the absence of any cost-cutting benefits and its non-involvement in integrating developers into their new working environment, and you may find that you need a different Triplebyte competitor, such as Terminal. 

6. X-Team

X-team is a fully remote, tech-oriented community of elite developers from over 75 countries worldwide. Its market includes countries in Africa, Latin America, Europe, and Asia that have recently begun to boom as sources of in-demand developer talent. The platform prides itself on inclusion, diversity, human capital development, and a team-oriented work ethic. 

Triplebyte vs X-Team

In addition to drawing developer talent from a more diverse, global pool and operating at an undiminished capacity, X-Team has the following advantages over Triplebyte:

• Its team-oriented internal culture makes it far more suited than Triplebyte to hiring developers into roles requiring team cooperation. 
• X-team hirings can take less time than Triplebyte. You can request a developer and expect to have them ready for their new job in a few days, although some roles may take weeks to fill. 
• When it comes to onboarding your new hire, X-team has your back. This is primarily because of the platform’s team-oriented culture, which helps ensure that your developer integrates perfectly into their new team. 

X-Team Shortfalls

X-team’s website does not share its developer rates or pricing fees, so you have to get on the site and initiate hiring negotiations before you find out. Additionally, X-team professionals are all of the elite caliber, so getting an entry-level software engineer on the platform isn’t possible. To add to this lack of variety in available expertise levels, the platform only sources and hires full-time developers, so if you need part-time, short-term, or single-task contract staff, you won’t find them there.

What’s the Best Platform for Hiring Remote Software Engineers?

There are numerous options when it comes to securing remote developers, and the choices can be difficult to navigate. However, only one of these options offers a well-rounded and truly balanced talent-sourcing solution with no notable weaknesses: Terminal.io. 

Terminal offers you everything you need in a hiring platform: speed, reliability, global credibility, affordability, incentives, flexibility, transparency, variety regarding available developer talent, tech specialization, masterful AI utilization—you name it. So, if you’re on the hunt for the best talent, look no further. Terminal opens up a world of unrivaled remote development talent.

FAQ

Why should I consider Triplebyte alternatives for hiring remote software engineers?

You should consider Triplebyte alternatives because the software developer hiring platform is no longer in operation. Fortunately, there are several competitors that provide top remote tech talent.

What’s the best Triplebyte alternative for software development?

Terminal.io is the best Triplebyte alternative to consider for software development. The platform carefully pre-vets and matches talented remote engineers in Latin America, Canada, and Europe to businesses based on skills and fit. Major corporations and startups alike trust Terminal for hiring quality talent fast.